

Discover more from gender:hacked by Eliza Mondegreen
All things gender identity.
Over 5,000 subscribers
Continue reading
The New York Times decided to take a drunken ramble through my research area. Unfortunately, I don’t have time to write a whole thing today, merely to say that it’s very easy to praise what you don’t understand and that’s exactly what the Times does here.
Here are a few of the many, many, many things I’ve written about questioning your gender online:
Online trans communities: lifeline or quicksand?
Good that you have responded it so quickly. And just like the previous NYT article, the comments from the readers (see Readers Picks) have been brutal, honest, and raw. Once again, an NYT article is getting brutally ratioed by the readers. And these are readers of the NY Times, for goodness sake!
Excellent Post.
To your byline question...after reading the horror stories over at PITT...I would say "quicksand" can appropriately be replaced with "meat grinder".
We all need to start using terms that accurately explain the reality, of the effects, these radical cultic movements are having on the kids. As with pedophilia and pedophiles - I no longer use abuse, when referring to the crime of Child sexual assault. I use rape and sodomy. Abuse, takes the edge off the atrocities these rapists and sodomizers are committing on these kids. MAP's...give me a break...they are perverts, predators, molester and deviants.
Lets start using terms and language, that matches the untold damage these movements and actors are foisting on the most vulnerable of us...The children.