She isn’t describing all men. I suppose she could have repeatedly put in that qualifier explicitly but that is not her obligation. Let the “normal” men themselves distinguish themselves. This is what women must do as well- distinguish ourselves from Macy Gray, etc.
She isn’t describing all men. I suppose she could have repeatedly put in that qualifier explicitly but that is not her obligation. Let the “normal” men themselves distinguish themselves. This is what women must do as well- distinguish ourselves from Macy Gray, etc.
I'm not describing all men, which I think is pretty clear, and I wouldn’t have any interest in describing all men in those terms. I'm talking about a subset of men identifying as women, who've shown the rest of us a lot about themselves by disregarding women's boundaries and who are trying to redefine women in line with the most degrading stereotypes.
My young adult son is one of these men, newly indoctrinated and medically transitioning. I see him as a misogynist and narcissist, but I also see him as a victim. Low self-esteem, lack of real-world connections, mental illness (anxiety, OCD, ADHD, maybe undiagnosed ASD), and inadequate parental supervision all played a role in his evolution. I'm sure he's been exposed to sissy porn, to hentai, and to the nonsensical gibberish of the TRA. At around age 12, he withdrew into himself. He became vicious, but also seemed terribly lonely, and his dad and I tiptoed around him for years, afraid of incurring his wrath or adding to his distress. My question is who benefits from this? Certainly big pharma. What other interests are behind the sissification push?
She isn’t describing all men. I suppose she could have repeatedly put in that qualifier explicitly but that is not her obligation. Let the “normal” men themselves distinguish themselves. This is what women must do as well- distinguish ourselves from Macy Gray, etc.
I'm not describing all men, which I think is pretty clear, and I wouldn’t have any interest in describing all men in those terms. I'm talking about a subset of men identifying as women, who've shown the rest of us a lot about themselves by disregarding women's boundaries and who are trying to redefine women in line with the most degrading stereotypes.
You did make it clear.
Great piece.
Yeah, it seems like D.E. Murray and I fully agree on this... so, we'll see.
My young adult son is one of these men, newly indoctrinated and medically transitioning. I see him as a misogynist and narcissist, but I also see him as a victim. Low self-esteem, lack of real-world connections, mental illness (anxiety, OCD, ADHD, maybe undiagnosed ASD), and inadequate parental supervision all played a role in his evolution. I'm sure he's been exposed to sissy porn, to hentai, and to the nonsensical gibberish of the TRA. At around age 12, he withdrew into himself. He became vicious, but also seemed terribly lonely, and his dad and I tiptoed around him for years, afraid of incurring his wrath or adding to his distress. My question is who benefits from this? Certainly big pharma. What other interests are behind the sissification push?