The leaked lobbying guide that advocates tying transgender issues to race is quite the read, from the call to "build the choir" to the argument that recognizing 'transgirls' are "actually male" is transphobic. You'll find all the usual misdirection: recognizing sex is discriminating against people for being trans, the specious analogy between separating people by sex in settings where sex matters with segregating people by race. The guide argues that advocates "can and should connect justice for transgender people to issues of racial and economic justice." Frankly, the only 'connection' is a parasitic one, however. Trans rights benefit from being linked to the struggles for racial and economic justice.
"Our research also suggests that pluralizing and personalizing genders — making statements about “genders” or “our genders” instead of “gender” as a singular and abstract concept — subtly helps orient people towards our worldview."
"Base adults and activists are more likely to agree with strong intensity that we should trust transgender young people to know what is best for their own health and well-being when they are primed with the authentic selves statement, which also better alienates opposition adults."
What exactly is their "worldview"? I'm guessing articulating that in all but the most heavily market-researched terms wouldn't appeal to most people, either. And I think we can safely assume that "opposition adults" includes parents who want to protect their children from harmful medical outcomes, like, say, sterilization and sexual dysfunction.
This document seeks to legitimize trans ideology as some kind of noble civil rights movement. Reminds me of the sales materials used to market opioids to physicians. Whatever you do, don't read the fine print.
These sneaky tactics just proves they’re abusive men after all.
"Our research also suggests that pluralizing and personalizing genders — making statements about “genders” or “our genders” instead of “gender” as a singular and abstract concept — subtly helps orient people towards our worldview."
"Base adults and activists are more likely to agree with strong intensity that we should trust transgender young people to know what is best for their own health and well-being when they are primed with the authentic selves statement, which also better alienates opposition adults."
What exactly is their "worldview"? I'm guessing articulating that in all but the most heavily market-researched terms wouldn't appeal to most people, either. And I think we can safely assume that "opposition adults" includes parents who want to protect their children from harmful medical outcomes, like, say, sterilization and sexual dysfunction.
This document seeks to legitimize trans ideology as some kind of noble civil rights movement. Reminds me of the sales materials used to market opioids to physicians. Whatever you do, don't read the fine print.