In which Margaret Atwood tries to have it both ways, gets doxxed and deluged with threats
elizamondegreen.substack.com
I’m tired of “shouldn’t.” This isn’t a question of “should” and “shouldn’t,” but “does” and “doesn’t.” That’s because “trans inclusivity” does come at the expense of women's rights whenever gender identity is equated with sex — that is, whenever we treat some males as though they were female — in any setting where sex matters. And in settings where sex doesn't matter, what would it even mean to treat someone "like a woman," anyway?
In which Margaret Atwood tries to have it both ways, gets doxxed and deluged with threats
In which Margaret Atwood tries to have it…
In which Margaret Atwood tries to have it both ways, gets doxxed and deluged with threats
I’m tired of “shouldn’t.” This isn’t a question of “should” and “shouldn’t,” but “does” and “doesn’t.” That’s because “trans inclusivity” does come at the expense of women's rights whenever gender identity is equated with sex — that is, whenever we treat some males as though they were female — in any setting where sex matters. And in settings where sex doesn't matter, what would it even mean to treat someone "like a woman," anyway?