1 Comment
⭠ Return to thread

Indeed. But not just "sterilize kids", but turn them into sexless eunuchs.

On which Helen Joyce had some pithy comments, though Standpoint is defunct and there are some formatting problems:

https://web.archive.org/web/20201113021904/https://standpointmag.co.uk/speaking-up-for-female-eunuchs/

Still, underlines the stark horror of what the odious euphemism of "gender-affirming care" really entails.

Why there's substantially more value in the standard biological definitions for the sexes, as opposed to the risibly anti-scientific "patchwork definitions of the social sciences":

"On a deeper level, the ‘patchwork’ definition of sex used in the social sciences [and by Genspect, & Emma Hilton] is purely descriptive and lacks a functional rationale. This contrasts sharply with how the sexes are defined in biology. From a biological standpoint, what distinguishes the males and females of a species is the size of their gametes: males produce small gametes (e.g., sperm), females produce large gametes (e.g., eggs; Kodric-Brown & Brown, 1987)"

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346447193_Ideological_Bias_in_the_Psychology_of_Sex_and_Gender

No doubt that adults should, presumably, be allowed to do that to themselves - something of a thing during the heyday of Imperial China:

https://www.usrf.org/news/010308-hiddenpower.html

However, dysphoric and autistic children? Crime of the century, Mengele compounded with Tuskegee Syphilis Study.

Expand full comment