You are talking BS but like your misogynist brethren you blame women and feminists for the actions of disordered, misogynist, porn-sick male fetishists. The male, heterosexual cross-dresser sexual fetishists who are the primary funders, promoters, and beneficiaries of this pernicious trans movement--along w/ some insufferable homo men as…
You are talking BS but like your misogynist brethren you blame women and feminists for the actions of disordered, misogynist, porn-sick male fetishists. The male, heterosexual cross-dresser sexual fetishists who are the primary funders, promoters, and beneficiaries of this pernicious trans movement--along w/ some insufferable homo men as well-- have bullied their way into women's spaces and orgs. And there are some women who call themselves feminists--mostly those 'academic feminists'-- who do not represent all feminists or women's rights advocates or liberationists and certainly not the radical feminists and lesbian feminists who have been the most vehement against these male perverts. It is the radical feminists and lesbian feminists who have been pushing back on these disgusting male sexual fetishists w/ their pornified parodies of women for decades. Janice Raymond, a lesbian feminist professor at the U of Mass, wrote her book, The Transsexual Empire, in 1979, calling out the danger of 'trans' to women. And they have continued to push back on the 'trans' BS and have been bullied, threatened, de-platformed, and attacked for doing so.
Why have these men only "bullied their way into" feminist organizations so much more effectively than other organizations? Why does every poll show greater support for transgender ideology among women than among men? Why are mothers more likely to trans their children than men are? I don't know exactly what the answers to these questions are, but asking them is not misogyny (just like questioning the trans movement isn't evidence of a phobia).
You are literally commenting on a site where feminists and other women are calling out and pushing back on the trans lunacy. There are feminists who have never accepted this male fetishism and I focus on those women as they are feminists who center women. Male fetishists (troons) who have inserted themselves into women's orgs and call themselves feminists are delusional, disordered predators b/c no decent man would do that. And any woman who would countenance such behavior should be ashamed of themselves as they are no supporter of women.
I didn't say there were no women or feminists who oppose gender nonsense (although conservative women are better about it). Only that a great number are agreeable with it, especially those in nominally feminist institutions.
But y'all seem rather reluctant to consider how and what feminism has contributed to the transgender clusterfuck. "gender" is -- to a large extent -- the creation, if not the Frankensteinian monster, of feminism.
It is the monster of male fetishism and women are not responsible for disordered men's sexual fetishes and paraphilias--they are responsible for their delusions and their pervy behavior--they have to take responsibility for themselves.
Good questions -- the answers to which aren't particularly flattering to either women or feminism in general. The former generally not well-served by the latter.
ICYMI, a rather brilliant essay on the topic by Marco Del Giudice of the University of New Mexico, the link to which Colin Wright had tweeted several years ago:
Much of feminism has, rather sadly, been corrupted by a great deal of anti-scientific and postmodernist claptrap. Methinks that Eliza might find it useful or profitable to promote a discussion on the topic -- even if it may, at least in the short term, jeopardize the buttering of her own bread ...
That's the rot at the heart of much of feminism -- 23 "sects", according to Wikipedia, at each other's throats over ideological claptrap, much of it motivated by putting feelings before facts -- see Dale.
A recent case in point being the rather unedifying spectacle, a cat fight that only needs a mud pit to complete the picture, between the three "tribes" headed by Jane Clare Jones, Posie Parker, and the Sex Matters group (Maya Forstater, Helen Joyce).
A pox on all your houses -- "when elephants fight it is the grass that suffers"
You are talking BS but like your misogynist brethren you blame women and feminists for the actions of disordered, misogynist, porn-sick male fetishists. The male, heterosexual cross-dresser sexual fetishists who are the primary funders, promoters, and beneficiaries of this pernicious trans movement--along w/ some insufferable homo men as well-- have bullied their way into women's spaces and orgs. And there are some women who call themselves feminists--mostly those 'academic feminists'-- who do not represent all feminists or women's rights advocates or liberationists and certainly not the radical feminists and lesbian feminists who have been the most vehement against these male perverts. It is the radical feminists and lesbian feminists who have been pushing back on these disgusting male sexual fetishists w/ their pornified parodies of women for decades. Janice Raymond, a lesbian feminist professor at the U of Mass, wrote her book, The Transsexual Empire, in 1979, calling out the danger of 'trans' to women. And they have continued to push back on the 'trans' BS and have been bullied, threatened, de-platformed, and attacked for doing so.
Why have these men only "bullied their way into" feminist organizations so much more effectively than other organizations? Why does every poll show greater support for transgender ideology among women than among men? Why are mothers more likely to trans their children than men are? I don't know exactly what the answers to these questions are, but asking them is not misogyny (just like questioning the trans movement isn't evidence of a phobia).
You are literally commenting on a site where feminists and other women are calling out and pushing back on the trans lunacy. There are feminists who have never accepted this male fetishism and I focus on those women as they are feminists who center women. Male fetishists (troons) who have inserted themselves into women's orgs and call themselves feminists are delusional, disordered predators b/c no decent man would do that. And any woman who would countenance such behavior should be ashamed of themselves as they are no supporter of women.
I didn't say there were no women or feminists who oppose gender nonsense (although conservative women are better about it). Only that a great number are agreeable with it, especially those in nominally feminist institutions.
Thank you for the clarification Simon.
Good for you.
But y'all seem rather reluctant to consider how and what feminism has contributed to the transgender clusterfuck. "gender" is -- to a large extent -- the creation, if not the Frankensteinian monster, of feminism.
Motes and beams, pots and kettles.
It is the monster of male fetishism and women are not responsible for disordered men's sexual fetishes and paraphilias--they are responsible for their delusions and their pervy behavior--they have to take responsibility for themselves.
Anyone who aids fetishist men to gain access to vulnerable women is also responsible for their own behavior. Do you agree?
Good questions -- the answers to which aren't particularly flattering to either women or feminism in general. The former generally not well-served by the latter.
ICYMI, a rather brilliant essay on the topic by Marco Del Giudice of the University of New Mexico, the link to which Colin Wright had tweeted several years ago:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346447193_Ideological_Bias_in_the_Psychology_of_Sex_and_Gender
Much of feminism has, rather sadly, been corrupted by a great deal of anti-scientific and postmodernist claptrap. Methinks that Eliza might find it useful or profitable to promote a discussion on the topic -- even if it may, at least in the short term, jeopardize the buttering of her own bread ...
🙄 "misogynist" and "troll" seem to be go-to replacements for playing the race card these days, particularly among various feminists.
And "BS"? You think Helen Dale is a "misogynist"? She said pretty much exactly what I've said in her review of Perry's recent book:
" ... Cordelia Fine, a philosopher now notorious for trying to edit science to fit in with feminism."
https://lawliberty.org/book-review/feminising-feminism/
That's the rot at the heart of much of feminism -- 23 "sects", according to Wikipedia, at each other's throats over ideological claptrap, much of it motivated by putting feelings before facts -- see Dale.
A recent case in point being the rather unedifying spectacle, a cat fight that only needs a mud pit to complete the picture, between the three "tribes" headed by Jane Clare Jones, Posie Parker, and the Sex Matters group (Maya Forstater, Helen Joyce).
A pox on all your houses -- "when elephants fight it is the grass that suffers"
Thank you for the reveal.
As what? Someone not particularly impressed by much of feminist ideology?
Over 20 different "sects" -- at last count, bit of a joke:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_movements_and_ideologies#Movements_and_ideologies
Seems like you might want to be a bit more critical of it yourself ...