After spending last month with Judith Butler’s excruciating Who’s Afraid of Gender?, we’re going to move in the opposite direction (readable, practical) for our next book-club read, How to Have Impossible Conversations by Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay (notably, before he contracted Internet brain-poisoning…):
From politics and religion to workplace negotiations, ace the high-stakes conversations in your life with this indispensable guide from a persuasion expert.
In our current political climate, it seems impossible to have a reasonable conversation with anyone who has a different opinion. Whether you're online, in a classroom, an office, a town hall—or just hoping to get through a family dinner with a stubborn relative—dialogue shuts down when perspectives clash. Heated debates often lead to insults and shaming, blocking any possibility of productive discourse. Everyone seems to be on a hair trigger.
In How to Have Impossible Conversations, Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay guide you through the straightforward, practical, conversational techniques necessary for every successful conversation—whether the issue is climate change, religious faith, gender identity, race, poverty, immigration, or gun control. Boghossian and Lindsay teach the subtle art of instilling doubts and opening minds. They cover everything from learning the fundamentals for good conversations to achieving expert-level techniques to deal with hardliners and extremists. This book is the manual everyone needs to foster a climate of civility, connection, and empathy.
We won’t be able to meet before mid-to-late October due to my schedule. But please feel free to start talking about the book here—and sharing your own s
Stella and Sasha interviewed Billboard Chris at the Lisbon Genspect conference. They asked him how is able to have conversations about this stuff.
He mentions how he was trained in sales--of course!--and that the first goal is to find something to agree about. He asks if they agree that girls can like playing with trucks, say, and boys can like pink. They agree. Then he stays quiet--he lets them think about how that contradicts gender ideology.
He then asks them questions: asks them to clarify their views on the topic. As they explain, they begin to come across the incoherencies. He seems to avoid explaining things until asked--so if someone asserts medicalization prevents suicide, he brings up the actual research on that. And so on.
He really does model calm interaction--something I have failed to do!
Found this gem today of an excerpt of some of the techniques from the book that Peter Boghossian has turned into what he now calls Spectrum Street Epistemology. He employs various techniques to interrogate how the participants arrived at their opinion and offers them opportunities to revise their position on any given prompt without actually directly refuting them.
This episode features Warren Smith who many of you might be aware of as the teacher who engaged in some excellent critical thinking with a student who assumed JKR was transphobic.
https://x.com/wtsmith17/status/1841521266773090504?s=46