

Discover more from gender:hacked by Eliza Mondegreen
As someone who has been openly skeptical of the trans movement for years, I've recently had a lot of friends and colleagues—every single one of whom would describe themselves as liberals or progressives—reach out to me to ask questions and express their own serious reservations about trans activism. So I do get the sense that the tide is turning in the US.
But I'm also curious how this is breaking down demographically. In my age bracket, I know a lot of 30-something women who advocating for trans issues more feverishly than ever before. A few friendships of mine that had survived years of deep disagreement about gender recently collapsed—not my doing.
Here's what that looks like to me: the trans movement continues to radicalize and as a result is alienating people who were prepared to lend their passive support but balked when they realized they were expected to be zealots. The movement is increasingly shedding people who were active and vocal supporters who had nevertheless not really understood what they were supporting and now are having second thoughts. But the supporters who remain are becoming more fanatical than ever, since they view their precious and righteous cause as under attack.
One of my closest friends made an interesting observation the other day: she said can't think of any other social cause that ‘progressive’ people are expected to support so loudly and passionately and often viciously.
In certain progressive circles, it's just not acceptable to have a neutral, passive, or private stance on issues that would normally stir up controversy. (Take “Let’s run a big medical experiment on a bunch of kids who might have otherwise grown up to be gay!” That would have been a very hard sell five or 10 years ago. But the branding’s changed since then.)
Before I terfed out on Facebook, I had acquaintances and colleagues I didn't know well message me asking why I didn't promote trans causes or mention 'transwomen' in my frequent posts about women's issues. For years, mere silence on this issue has been conspicuous and suspect.
I can't state enough how Not Normal that is. But when something can only be true if everyone plays along, then everyone must be made to play along, even if they have to pulled from their seats and 'danced' about like marionettes.
But now the whole macabre affair is starting to fall apart. The spirits have run dry. The music is starting to sound more like screeching and the marionettes are weary and starting to snip their strings.
What’s also happening is that an issue that activists insisted affects no one but 'trans' people has started to spill out into everybody's everyday lives.
Now lots of people have family members or friends who've come out as 'trans' and that means lots of people have seen loved ones fall under the sway of a belief system that is toxic at any dose.
Up close, trans narratives about authenticity and joy fall apart.
At this point, I know a lot of people who've come out as trans: classmates, colleagues, friends. It’s a sobering process to witness because every single person, without exception, got worse: more fragile and less able to function in day-to-day life, more rigid in their thinking, more self-obsessed and self-surveilling—not to mention less interesting to talk to.
Narrative and experience diverged painfully here. What does it mean to ‘support’ a loved one who comes out as trans? Does ‘support’ mean affirming their new trans identity? Or does support look more like trying to maintain a loving connection with someone who has joined a cult and hoping against hope that your loved one will someday find their way out?
The trans movement made impossible promises, both to its most devoted members and to the public.
To its members, the movement said: transition and you will finally be free to be who you always were deep down. As my research shows, the reality of transition is something else: dysphoria that migrates from one part of the body to the next, lingering doubts, a sense of falsity that spreads from a new name and altered sex marker down to the smallest interaction.
To allies, the movement said: you can't do feminism without us. You're no progressive if you don't support us. Then trans activism tore women's rights and progressive organizing to shreds.
To the public, the movement said—often with outright contempt)—“This doesn't affect you.” Unfortunately, it does, if you are unlucky enough to have a job you’d like to keep or a daughter with athletic dreams or an independent thought in your head you’d like to voice.
Is the tide turning in the US?
Excellent article. Charles Mackay wrote in 'Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds' (1841), “Is it a dull or uninstructive picture to see a whole people shaking suddenly off the trammels of reason, and running wild after a golden vision, refusing obstinately to believe that it is not real, till, like a deluded hind running after an ignis fatuus, they are plunged into a quagmire?” Mackay covers an eccentric miscellany of popular delusions, from the witch mania of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries to alchemists, magnetizers, slow poisoners, and the “influence of politics and religion on the hair and beard.” Much more recently in 'The Delusions of Crowds: Why People Go Mad in Groups' by William J. Bernstein (2021) writes 'Errors appear when individuals become overly influenced by what others think. The more a group interacts the more it behaves like a real crowd, and the less accurate its assessments become…. As put most succinctly by Friedrich Nietzsche, "Madness is rare in the individual - but with groups, parties, peoples, and ages it is the rule." Mackay also recognized this in his 'Extraordinary Popular Delusions' "Men, it is said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses more slowly, and one by one." I suspect the latter observation refers to why there will be no sudden and 'contagious' end to the transcult, no clearcut 'ending of a tide', as there was at its start. The return to sanity will be gradual, enduring, a slow 'one by one' recovery as deluded individuals emerge on their own from this monstrous nightmare (Goya: "The Sleep of Reason produces Monsters"). There is no arguing or debate to be had with transcult members, for, as Swift observed centuries ago, "... it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into." We can conclude that the transcult, like other cults, owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not directed towards truth but towards the power needed to maintain a delusion.
At my job, the 30-and-unders definitely fell under the ‘even more feverishly than before’ category. And THEY are the ones who volunteer on the DEI team, making bulletin boards and sending out ‘Inclusion’ emails. During Women’s History Month, there was a bulletin board celebrating 12 (yes, TWELVE) memoirs by trans women. I’m bracing myself for Pride month. When I speak to the older people (first I have to carefully bring the subject up because people are too scared to talk about it) there does seem to be apprehension and even some anger, so I do hope the tide is turning. But I think these people need to speak up more. And sooner. I was thinking about this recently--if one vocal, angry person had balked and spoken out after the first pronoun bulletin board went up, then maybe it would’ve been enough to get it taken down. And we wouldn’t be in the situation we’re in now, with pronoun bulletin boards around every corner.