For years, I got away with expressing polite but wide-ranging skepticism about the new roster of ‘progressive’ orthodoxies. I avoided a few known landmines but I didn’t falsify my beliefs, just softened them a bit. I asked questions I should not have asked, questions that strongly suggested I still knew things I ought to have forgotten overcome.
Yet I didn’t fall out with anyone during that time. Instead, I was repeatedly “called in.”
I was never called in for my serious crimes, only for misdemeanors. But I was definitely a repeat offender. Once I made the mistake of laughing too hard at a joke about Trump’s small hands. Laughing at jokes about men with small hands having small penises and therefore being less manly apparently offends women who identify as men who have small hands and no penises. This all seemed rather byzantine to me but I digress. I made the mistake of looking forward to spending Thanksgiving with my family (pernicious settler-colonialism in action!). I suggested we drop the land acknowledgement from a presentation that was running over time (the substance got sacrificed instead). I said I didn’t have any inner feeling that made me a woman and that I was just female (and that that didn’t make me agender). I criticized Islam (and I’d do it again!). I questioned the claim that valuing the “written word” was a manifestation of white supremacy (I even did it in writing). I said things like “OK, but we can agree everybody who has ever gotten pregnant is female, right?” (Wrong.) In other words: I was your standard liberal c. 2010. But it was 2015.
As a result, I experienced a lot of one-on-one interventions where I could tell that my friend or colleague had anxiously plotted out talking points in advance—or at least skimmed a Buzzfeed listicle. And I would say things like, “I understand where you’re coming from but I don’t see it that way.” As a reeducation subject, I was lacking.
These friends of mine showed me the kind of tolerance one might show an aging relative who’s losing her marbles one by one. Or perhaps ‘indulgence’ is a better word than tolerance: You know how she is.
I was a little problematic, sure, but that was about it. I was still one of the Good People. I just had stick-in-the-mud tendencies. When I lodged verboten objections, I was surely only playing Devil’s advocate—not yet a capital offense.
But at a certain point, I seem to have crossed over from being seen as a Good Person Who Is A Little Off-Script to a Bad Person Who Really Meant What She Was Saying All Along. And not only had I meant every ‘problematic’ thing I’d ever said (😬), but those problematic comments were suddenly recast as mere dogwhistles for all of the truly heinous things I had never dared to say out loud and would vociferously deny if asked but no doubt believed deep down.
That was the point of no return. Nothing I could say—even if I had been able to print off every thought that had ever run through my head—could have cleared my name.
This is the thing it’s impossible to understand until you find yourself on the wrong side of it. You always think you’ll be able to explain yourself and be understood. That any cancellation attempts leveled against you will be misunderstandings and so of course you will be able to convince your cancellers they picked the wrong target. (The revolution leaps and sometimes overleaps!—or something.)
But once you’ve been marked, it’s over. Your every word will be twisted, your motives impugned, your clearest speech declared a mere cover for bigotry. There will be nothing you can do about it.
The consolation is that, over time, more and more people will find themselves on the wrong side of the line, for lesser and lesser ideological crimes. It’s getting less lonely over here all the time.
This was very much my experience too. The moment I was "marked" c. 2018 for saying publicly that I didn't think the Labour Party should be interrogating and punishing its female members for asking questions about proposed policy changes to the Gender Recognition Act, the machine came for me. Someone anonymously texted me to say they were sitting in a meeting "to decide what to do with me" and subsequently there were fake campaigns set up to target me (I was named explicitly in their founding statements!); people published anonymous "Open Letters"; I was denounced by former friends and so on. Everything I'd ever said was retconned as secretly already "evil". I was denounced for talking to people and being friends with people who'd already been cancelled - had I not gotten the memo? I felt for years like these people were looking for a dark stain, a little ant, in my soul, with a magnifying glass, and getting upset when they couldn't find it.
"You always think you’ll be able to explain yourself and be understood." I too thought this for years before I was cancelled. It's such a strange experience. The black and white thinking, the refusal to talk to someone you once knew, the abject cowardice, the baffling and defamatory accusations (I think the only things I wasn't accused of were the most serious crimes, presumably because at some point someone might have asked for evidence). The chronic misuse of political slurs - fascist, Nazi, far-right, as well as transphobe, TERF, bigot etc etc - absolute madness. And for what? Saying what everyone knew to be true five minutes ago! Let's hope the pendulum swings back/is swinging back to somewhere more dialogic, more pluralistic, more realistic.
My twist was being a liberal mom raising liberal kids (who graduated from college in 2009, 2013 and then the caboose in 2020). And my youngest went to college in Canada! My older two are pretty close to me in their thinking, though they consider pronouns a 'light lift' and I do not. (The eldest worked w Laverne Cox and thinks of LC as "her." The middle has NB housemates.) The youngest was *incensed* at me for some time. He graduated into covid and came home to being bored, which did not help. There's nothing quite like being considered a stealth heinous bigot by your own child! It took about two years, a dozen hot arguments and then many subsequent calmer talks for his knee jerk judgement of me to end. I had to pick at the argument from the edges in. I have been able to persuade him that the ideals I hold dear (child protection, women's rights, gay rights) demand I question and object to excessive demands of one group, impinging on those others.