Beautiful, capable, sacred?

Yes, of course, to the ability for trans people to exist in the world without threat and to the need for a conversation about what the future looks like, but the "agreeing that Trans people are beautiful, capable" is just more of the weird mysticism that's attached itself to this topic.

And begs the question of whether it's acceptable to disagree with some aspects of trans politics like the odd glorification of all things trans, especially when that glorification contributes to both mystical unquestionable authority and kids becoming lifelong medical patients?

Like all people, trans-identifying people deserve basic human rights and the recognition that trans people are unique individuals who are variously capable of being good, bad, beautiful, ugly, proficient, inept, whatever, etc.

I don't agree that trans people, by virtue of being trans—a state trans activists struggle or refuse to define in any practical way—are sacred authorities on gender or the human condition or that they should be held to different standards than any other human being.